Ken spent some time discussing
aggression in animals, which he defines as “any unwanted agonistic
behavior.” There is a bit of a grey area here, I think; while most
people would not consider a cat catching and killing a mouse to be
aggressive, to the mouse, it most definitely is. Still, there are
some general rules about aggression that seem to hold up regardless
of who is discussing it. Where applicable, I have cited the
researcher (and year of their published work) whom Ken credited for
the rule.
First, most (if not all) animals have
some degree of aggression in their repertoire (Lorenz). It’s just
normal for animals to be aggressive in order to protect themselves
(for example, if they are ill) or their young. Aggression may also be
used to determine social hierarchies or who gets access to food or
mates. However, Ken was quick to tell us that this does not mean that
we shouldn’t take aggression seriously, nor that we shouldn’t try
to modify it.
Animals who have the opportunity to
aggress will do so more often (Johnson, 1972). Ken told us that most
zoo keepers would never even consider engaging in free-contact with
lions (no barriers between them) because lions who have the
opportunity to be aggressive often are.
An animal who has been food deprived
will aggress more readily than an animal who has adequate provisions
(Staddon, 1977). This is part of the reason that Ken is so adamant
that all animals under his care gets its full rations regardless of
whether or not they perform well in training.
The use of punishment or aversive
control will cause aggression (Kazdin, 1984). Not only can
frustration yield aggression, but it’s also important to note that
pain can cause an instinctive aggressive response.
Aggression can also be shaped by
accidental reinforcement (Skinner, 1963). It is easy to understand
how this might come about; if a dog growls at another dog because he
is too close, and that dog goes away, the aggression was successful.
Aggression can also be shaped deliberately.
Finally, animals respond more favorably
to a consistent environment, so trainers should use caution to
condition changes slowly and positively (Turner, 1999). I think this
last point is especially important to remember; although we often
want quick fixes and miracle cures, the results are ultimately better
and longer-lasting when we are patient.
Ken cautioned us that this list is not
meant to be all-inclusive. There are likely other general rules about
aggression that were either not covered or that scientists are in the
process of discovering even as I write this. Although I do not have
any references to cite, I would say that in my experience, once an
aggressive action enters an animal’s repertoire, it’s always
there. The animal may not use that response as the first, second, or
third choice, but it can always crop up again. This is why I’m so
careful with Maisy, even though she’s basically normal these days.
What about you? Are there general rules you’d add to this list?
1 comment:
Hi, Interesting and thought provoking as usual..
Could you provide more information about where to find the sources you mentioned:
Johnson, Staddon, 1977, Kazdin, 1984
I'd love to study this in more depth...
Post a Comment